PrintFriendlyThe declaration of a State of Emergency in India on June 25, 1975, remains a somber chapter in the nation’s democratic journey — a period that witnessed an unprecedented assault on fundamental rights and a profound crisis of governance. This article delves into the various facets of the Emergency, examining its motivations, instruments of suppression, the courage of those who resisted, and its lasting legacy on Indian democracy.
The Emergency was not a sudden impulse but the culmination of escalating political tensions and Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s increasingly authoritarian tendencies. Facing a formidable challenge from a united opposition — particularly after the Allahabad High Court’s judgment on June 12, 1975, which found her guilty of electoral malpractice and disqualified her from Parliament — Gandhi opted for an extreme measure. The decision to impose the Emergency was made hastily and with minimal consultation, seemingly driven by a desperate desire to cling to power. This swift, unilateral act bypassed established democratic norms and processes, effectively suspending the Constitution and concentrating all power in the hands of the executive.
Critics contend that Indira Gandhi’s primary motivation for imposing the Emergency was deeply personal and self-serving: to nullify the Allahabad High Court’s verdict and avert political ruin. The narrative propagated by the government at the time — citing internal disturbances and threats to national security — largely failed to convince a populace that witnessed the rapid dismantling of democratic institutions. Her actions during this period reflected her belief that her leadership was indispensable, even if it meant sacrificing the very principles of democracy she was sworn to uphold. The Emergency, therefore, is often seen as a stark example of an individual prioritizing personal ambition above national interest.
At the heart of the Emergency’s oppressive machinery was the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA). This draconian law permitted preventive detention without charge or trial, effectively suspending the right to habeas corpus. Thousands of political opponents, activists, journalists, and dissenting voices were rounded up and incarcerated under MISA, often in secret and without any recourse. MISA became a chilling symbol of the government’s arbitrary power, silencing dissent through fear and imprisonment. Its widespread misuse highlighted the fragility of individual liberties in the face of unchecked state authority.
The human cost of MISA and the Emergency was tragically exemplified by the case of Snehalata Reddy, a renowned Kannada actress and activist. Arrested under MISA, she was denied proper medical care in prison, leading to a severe deterioration of her health. She was eventually released on parole, only to die shortly thereafter due to her worsening condition. Snehalata Reddy’s death became a poignant symbol of the brutality and inhumane treatment meted out to political prisoners during the Emergency, drawing widespread condemnation and exposing the dark underbelly of state repression.
Amidst the palpable fear and repression, one figure emerged as the moral compass of the nation: Jayaprakash Narayan, popularly known as JP. A veteran Gandhian and socialist, JP galvanized the opposition with his resonant call for “Total Revolution,” advocating for fundamental change across political, social, and economic spheres. He became the defiant face of the anti-Emergency movement, inspiring countless individuals to resist the authoritarian regime. Despite his frail health and subsequent arrest, JP’s unwavering commitment to democracy and civil liberties provided a much-needed beacon of hope and solidified his place as an icon of resistance.
The Emergency witnessed an unprecedented assault on the Indian Constitution. However, it also galvanized a remarkable generation of individuals who, through their courage and sacrifice, ultimately preserved the democratic fabric of the nation. This included countless student activists, lawyers, journalists, trade unionists, and ordinary citizens who defied censorship, protested the arrests, and worked tirelessly to expose the government’s excesses. Their unwavering commitment to constitutional values, often at great personal risk, ensured that the spirit of democracy was kept alive, eventually leading to the restoration of civil liberties and free elections.
One of the most immediate and visible casualties of the Emergency was the freedom of the press. Censors were appointed to vet all news reports, editorials, and even advertisements before publication. Critical voices were stifled, and newspapers were compelled to carry government propaganda. Electricity supply to newspaper offices was severed, and journalists who dared to defy censorship faced arrest and harassment. This systematic suppression of information created an atmosphere of fear and misinformation, preventing the public from knowing the true extent of the repression and the resistance.
While often overlooked in mainstream narratives, the Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its allied organizations played a significant role in resisting the Emergency. Despite being banned by the government, RSS cadres went underground, organizing protests, disseminating uncensored information, and providing support to the families of political prisoners. Their highly disciplined network and cadre-based structure proved effective in maintaining a sustained opposition to the Emergency. Many prominent leaders associated with Hindutva bodies were imprisoned, and their activism during this period contributed to the broader anti-Emergency movement.
The eventual lifting of the Emergency in January 1977 and the subsequent general elections resulted in a resounding defeat for Indira Gandhi and the Congress Party. This outcome was a powerful affirmation of the Indian people’s commitment to democracy and their unequivocal rejection of authoritarian rule. It was a clear verdict of “India vs. Indira,” where the democratic aspirations of the nation triumphed over the personal ambitions of an individual. The elections served as a critical turning point, demonstrating the resilience of Indian democracy and the ultimate power of the electorate.
For many, the Emergency remains the greatest blunder in the history of independent India — a period that severely tested the foundations of its democracy. It exposed the vulnerabilities of constitutional checks and balances, the dangers of unchecked executive power, and the ease with which fundamental rights can be suspended. While some argue that it brought a temporary semblance of order and discipline, the long-term damage to democratic institutions, public trust, and individual liberties far outweighed any perceived short-term gains. It stands as a cautionary tale — a stark reminder of the eternal vigilance required to safeguard democratic freedoms.
While countless individuals contributed to the resistance against the Emergency, many who later became prominent figures in the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) played crucial roles, often as “unsung heroes.” Leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee and L.K. Advani were among the first to be arrested and spent the entirety of the Emergency in prison. Their steadfast opposition to the authoritarian regime, their intellectual contributions to the anti-Emergency discourse, and their organizational efforts from behind bars were instrumental in sustaining the resistance.
Other notable BJP leaders and ideologues who were actively involved in opposing the Emergency include:
- Nanaji Deshmukh — A senior RSS ideologue who went underground and played a vital role in coordinating the resistance network.
- K. Jana Krishnamurthi — Another key RSS functionary who was imprisoned during the Emergency.
- Sunder Singh Bhandari — A prominent Jana Sangh leader who was also detained.
- Arun Jaitley — As a young student leader, he was a prominent figure in the Delhi University anti-Emergency movement and was arrested under MISA.
- Narendra Modi — As a young RSS Pracharak, he went underground and was involved in various activities to oppose the Emergency, including distributing leaflets and helping underground activists.
These individuals, along with countless others from various political and social backgrounds, represent the collective spirit of defiance that ultimately restored democracy to India. Their sacrifices and unwavering commitment to constitutional values ensured that the Emergency, despite its profound impact, remained a temporary aberration rather than a permanent feature of the Indian political landscape. Their stories serve as a powerful reminder of the enduring strength of democratic ideals and the courage required to defend them.
Author
(The views expressed are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the position of the organisation)